could be and I just don't remember. SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES(7566, 'JONES', 'MANAGER', 7839,TO_DATE('2-APR-1981', 'DD-MON-YYYY'), 2975, NULL, 20); 1 row created. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. The book that I am learning from is teaching me to do it this way.
Browse by Topic AS/400 Business Intelligence Career Development Channel Cloud Computing Compliance Consumerization Content Management CRM Data Management Database DataCenter Desktop Management Development Email Administration Hardware IT Strategy Linux Lotus Domino By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. Example of ORA-01422 Error
SQL> declare v_student number; begin select student into v_student from michael.std where deptno=12; end; / declare * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01422: exact fetch returns That's wrong. check that
Privacy Follow Thanks! As is true with ALL SYS OWNED TABLES -- the moment you insert/update/delete them directly is the moment your database becomes UNSUPPORTED and UNSUPPORTABLE. First, to protect against no rows being returned, you can select the result of any type of aggregating function (such as AVG or COUNT). Copyright © 2015 Oracle and/or its affiliates.
Description When you encounter an ORA-01422 error, the following error message will appear: ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows Cause You tried to execute a SELECT INTO Followup June 02, 2009 - 7:40 am UTC the psuedo code logic of a select into is exactly this: declare cursor c is select * from .....; begin open c; fetch Merry Christmas.. Ora-01422 Exact Fetch Returns More Than Requested Number Of Rows Ora-06512 declare cursor c1 is select first_name, salary from employee; name varchar2(40); sal number; counter number; begin --find number of records select count(emp_id) into counter from employee; open c1; --print all for
what shall i do in this situation. Ora 01422 Oracle Somebody out there must remember - Tom, you can't be that young if you programmed at school on punch cards ;-) Paul Followup September 25, 2002 - 12:28 pm UTC but Built with love using Oracle Application Express 5. ugh, I hate that.
Followup May 09, 2011 - 7:19 am UTC give full example, REMOVE ALL CODE that is not relevant to getting the answer. Ora-01422 Exception Handling With that said, the tools above should be plenty to get started and work to develop a solution. Finally, a great recommendation would be to replace your SELECT INTO statement with a cursor. We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.
select * from t is an implicit cursor - but it'll NEVER raise no_data_found, nor will it ever raise too_many_rows - those two exceptions are unique to select into How to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19779483/pl-sql-ora-01422-exact-fetch-returns-more-than-requested-number-of-rows All rights reserved. Ora 01422 Unhandled Exception Another step that you can take to offset multiple row quandaries is to run a BULK COLLECT in a table to pull more variables. This will pull more rows and variables Ora 01422 Ora 06512 Here are some things you may want to try: This is most likely signifying that you have updated multiple rows.
This is a far cry from the simple Oracle errors that simply require changing the punctuation of a statement quickly and moving on. [email protected]> select * from dual; D - X [email protected]> select count(*) from dual; COUNT(*) ---------- 2 [email protected]> dual is magic, make sure to COUNT(*) it, not just select * from it Not the answer you're looking for? SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO DEPT VALUES (10, 'ACCOUNTING', 'NEW YORK'); 1 row created. Frm 40735 Ora 01422
If a select into (without bulk collect) does not return any rows - it throws an exception "no_data_found". or, even better: ops$tkyte%ORA11GR2> create or replace procedure my_procedure( subscription_id in number, inv_id in number ) 2 as 3 l_tps_structure_mode varchar2(100); 4 l_program_name varchar2(100):='TEST'; 5 BEGIN 6 SELECT TECHNOPEDIA_STRUCTURE_MODE 7 INTO Following Share this item with your network: HomeOracle PL / SQLAggregate FunctionsAnalytical FunctionsChar FunctionsConstraintsConversion FunctionsCursorData TypeDate TimezoneHierarchical QueryIndexInsert Delete UpdateLarge ObjectsNumeric Math FunctionsObject Oriented DatabasePL SQLRegular ExpressionsReport Column PageResult SetSelect QuerySequenceSQL For multiple record return in pl/sql block, you must have to use a CURSOR.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. Ora-01422 In Oracle Forms If so, why? Whoever taught you the "count them, then loop that many times" did you a huge disservice, you have a lot of bad practices to "unlearn" from that teacher.
This will be helpful because a function like COUNT will at the least be guaranteed to return some type of value. In real code, you'd never use dbms_output like this and would not depend on anyone seeing data that you write to the dbms_output buffer. Thank you! Ora-01422 In Cursor For Loop If for number I had 10 or 15 it would make only some loops based on this.
kam Report message to a moderator Re: ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows. [message #472151 is a reply to message #472148] Thu, 19 August mycollection.COUNT LOOP v_empno := mycollection(indx); dbms_output.put_line(v_empno); END LOOP; end; / Related Links - Difference Between Cursor And Ref cursor - View results of refcursor out parameter - ORA-01403: no data found I thought the sql_id, child_number combination was unique? Below is an example of what this would look like in action.
Please try again later. Tags: Thanks! SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES(7934, 'MILLER', 'CLERK', 7782,TO_DATE('23-JAN-1982', 'DD-MON-YYYY'), 1300, NULL, 10); 1 row created. But if Oracle have this magic thing (lets call it SQL*Magic for consistency), why don't they use it to prevent anyone adding another row to DUAL?
And most importantly, how can we fix it? The Solution There are a number of fixes and preemptive adjustments that you can make in order to prevent the issuance of an ORA-01422 error. Related examples in the same category1.ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined2.ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here3.ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression4.ORA-01403: no data found5.ORA-01403: no data found exception from procedure6.ORA-01426: numeric overflow7.ORA-01839: Copyright © 2003-2016 TechOnTheNet.com.
ORA-00001: unique constraint violated ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified or timeout expired ORA-00257: archiver error ORA-00600: internal error ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1 ORA-00900: invalid SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES(7654, 'MARTIN', 'SALESMAN', 7698,TO_DATE('28-SEP-1981', 'DD-MON-YYYY'), 1250, 1400, 30); 1 row created. Action: Rewrite the query to return fewer rows or specify more rows in the exact fetch. This will effectively create a loop that will fetch multiple rows without generating the error.
An initial step can be to check that the WHERE clause in your statement is exclusive enough to only matchup one row. select *from v$version; Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 begin select supplier_cd into :fin_ex_rev_head.vendor_code from fin_ex_rev_receipts where receipt_date between :keyblock.receipt_date and :keyblock.to_date and receipt_no||to_char(receipt_date,'DDMMRRRR') not in (select receipt_no||to_char(receipt_date,'DDMMRRRR') from fin_ex_rev_head where receipt_no is not null) order by invoice_no; end; i The type of vague contextual clue that Oracle attaches to this message concerning the error’s origins can be quite infuriating initially.